Originally Posted by Dolby
Not sure why you need to repeat yourself. What I said does not negate anything you have said...
|
Imho it does, or it simply gives a false sense of security.
It sounds like "we're doing a) and b) and therefore everything is fine" while it isn't. It looks like a justification to allow such addons while the justification is simply flawed.
To be more accurate would help, E.g.:
"We do a) and b) and we know it can be easily bypassed, but we ignore that risk, so we believe you can ignore it as well" would be more appropriate and leaves the decision to the reader (or at least forces the user to think about the meaning of it before making a decision). The way you wrote it, it could simply mean: "everything is fine, they check it and are certain it isn't an issue. so there's no risk for me", which is wrong and might lead to a decision, which might be a different one knowing more about the situation.
At least that kind of text is what I would prefer, if the addon stays available.